Pregnancy Discrimination Attorneys
Pregnancy Discrimination Lawsuits
It has been nearly four decades since Congress passed the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) to extend Title VII civil rights protections to pregnant workers. And yet for many, the decision to have a child still comes with a calculation about whether they will be treated differently by their employers.
Pregnancy discrimination affects employees from all sectors of the workforce, including high-performing workers at technology companies, finance, law firms, universities, and other corporate settings. Studies show that after pregnancy, the gender gap in pay and promotions grows dramatically.
Pregnancy discrimination most often occurs due to an employee’s pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical condition. But employees also experience discrimination for related issues, such as taking parental leave, receiving fertility treatment, having an abortion, or being a caregiver to children. These issues are deeply intertwined, and employers should not discriminate on these bases.
On This Page
How Are Pregnant Workers Discriminated Against in the Workplace?
What Protections Exist for Pregnant Workers?
What Protections Exist for Parental Leave?
What Protections Exist for Parenting Employees?
The Pump Act and Your Lactation Rights
How Can Sanford Heisler Sharp Help?
Successful Pregnancy Discrimination Cases
How Are Pregnant Workers Discriminated Against in the Workplace?
Overt discrimination is the easiest to identify. This occurs, for instance, when managers express the bias that pregnant workers and new mothers are less committed to their jobs, or openly profess a preference for employees who are not pregnant or who do not have caregiving obligations.
More commonly, however, employers do not announce their prejudices. Instead, their actions make clear that they are engaging in pregnancy discrimination, such as when an employee’s announcement that she is pregnant is followed by a negative performance review, the denial of a promotion or raise, or a demotion or termination.
What Protections Exist for Pregnant Workers?
In addition to state and local laws, the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) makes it unlawful for an employer to demote, fire, force to take leave, or refuse to hire an employee because they are pregnant. Similarly, courts have deemed it unlawful for an employer to discriminate during the pre-pregnancy phase, such as firing an employee for requesting time off to receive fertility treatments.
Further rights for pregnant workers, such as the right to take time off for medical appointments without fear of retaliation, are protected under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Employers must also provide “reasonable accommodations” for pregnant employees at work, provided they offer the same accommodations to similarly situated employees. For instance, if an employee returning to work following a hip surgery cannot lift heavy objects and is granted this accommodation by the employer, it is unlawful discrimination for the employer not to offer the same accommodation to an employee who is pregnant.
What Protections Exist for Parental Leave?
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) requires companies of 50 or more employees to provide up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave. This mandate applies to all workers who have accrued at least 12 months on the job.
“Job-protected leave” means that workers who have recently given birth and who take time off to care for a new baby are entitled to return to their same position following leave. The FMLA also covers leave for the partners of those who have given birth, for new adoptions and new foster care parents, and for those who need to care for a newborn with serious health conditions.
When an employee takes parental leave, it is unlawful for an employer to:
- Terminate the employee
- Demote them to a lesser position
- Deny them a promotion
- Force the employee to work during leave
- Retract a job offer based on pregnancy or intention to take leave
In addition to the FMLA, multiple states—including New York, the District of Columbia, and California—have implemented leave laws for new parents. Some states provide paid leave, and some mandate job protection like the FMLA does. Birthing parents may also be eligible for short-term disability.
Employees wishing to take parental leave should talk to their employer’s HR department about whether they qualify for FMLA, state leave laws, or short-term disability benefits. Employers cannot retaliate against employees for their intent to use such benefits.
What Protections Exist for Parenting Employees?
It is unlawful to discriminate against employees due to their commitments as caregivers to a newborn child. This applies to mothers and fathers; if an employer makes gender-based assumptions about an employee due to their childcare obligations, that can amount to sex or gender discrimination under Title VII.
The Pump Act and Workplace Lactation Rights
While it was already unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a nursing parent for pumping at work, the Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act, or “PUMP Act,” expanded lactation rights in the workplace.
Under the PUMP Act, employers must designate a clean and private space, other than a bathroom, for nursing mothers to express breast milk. While employers are not required to pay workers for break time used for pumping, nursing mothers are entitled to be compensated if those break periods are the same as the ones that employees receive for other purposes. The PUMP Act also extended lactation rights in the workplace to two years after the birth of a child. Several states provide similar benefits.
How Can Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight Help?
Our pregnancy discrimination attorneys have extensive experience combatting these prejudices. We are passionate about removing barriers for pregnant employees and parents in the workplace. In 2013, we were at the forefront of pregnancy discrimination litigation in filing a class action lawsuit against Merck, alleging that the pharmaceutical giant discouraged female employees from getting pregnant and structuring compensation to penalize those who did have a child (the case resulted in a $6.2 million settlement).
Successful Cases
We have litigated groundbreaking pregnancy discrimination class actions and negotiated confidential resolutions for numerous individuals. Our successful pregnancy discrimination settlements include:
- Securing a $6.2 million settlement in a pregnancy and gender discrimination class action on behalf of thousands of female sales representatives who worked at Merck
- Securing a $4 million settlement in a pregnancy and gender discrimination class action against Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Securing a seven-figure settlement for a female employee who was denied pregnancy accommodations and experienced medical complications during her pregnancy
- Securing a settlement worth multiple years of pay for a female lawyer who was denied work and advancement opportunities after she returned from maternity leave
- Securing a six-figure settlement on behalf of a female employee in the financial services industry who was denied pregnancy accommodations and terminated while on parental leave
- Securing a six-figure settlement on behalf of a female employee who was subjected to hostile treatment when she sought to pump in the workplace and was terminated after she complained
To learn about how Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight could help you in asserting your right to be free from pregnancy discrimination, reach out to our Discrimination and Harassment Practice Group.
Client Testimonials
“They have given me some closure for the first time in over five years.”
– Former Client
“Forever indebted to them”
– Suzy Reingold
“This Firm has proven again and again it has the necessary talent, experience, intelligence, creativity, and resources to represent workers and whistleblowers successfully against even the country’s largest employers.”
– Lorene Schaefer, Esq., President of WinWinResolve.com and Former GC of GE Transportation
“Collectively the SHSM team represented the highest level of professionalism, integrity, and passionate care for justice that I have ever witnessed in my career.”
– David Chen, a Former Client
“Everyone I interacted with at Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight was not only accomplished and brilliant at what they do, but also good people with good values.”
– Former Client
“Each member of the Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight team shows ultimate professionalism, mastery of the law, unwavering dedication to the clients and passion for the cause. And most important to me, kindness and compassion.”
– Former Client Donna Kassman, Lead Plaintiff in KPMG Gender Discrimination Class Action
As an attorney on the defense side, I can say there is simply no one better than Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight. That view is shared by defense attorneys around the country. They outwork the other side, master the law and facts, and achieve great results.”
– Maria Hallas, Attorney and Journalist
“Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight have taken the pharmaceutical industry by storm. They are shattering the glass ceiling imposed on women by pharma’s old boys’ club.”
– Jacqueline Pena, Lead Plaintiff in The Class Action Wellens v. Daiichi
“I deeply appreciated not only [the Firm’s] astute legal counsel, but also the understanding and human touch they used at every turn. . . . As a lawyer myself, I felt privileged to have gotten the chance to work with them.”
– Female Law Partner
“I contacted SHSM because it has a stellar reputation as a champion for workplace gender equality. That reputation is well-deserved; SHSM is a deft negotiator, a voracious advocate, and – most importantly – knows how to get results.”
– Former Client and VP of a Major Technology Company
“The team at Sanford Heisler consists of great people who are not only very skillful in the legal domain, but are also wonderful human beings with the highest degree of empathy for their clients.”
– A Female Director in a Tech Company
“Thank you again to you all for representing me on this matter. You are all phenomenal. I am very grateful for your knowledge, professionalism and compassion.”
– Big Law Attorney
“The result was extraordinary.”
– Marc Thomas, Attorney and Former CEO of GE Aviation Materials
$253 Million Settlement
Gender Discrimination Verdict Against Pharma Company
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight achieved the largest jury verdict in U.S. history in an employment discrimination case. A jury awarded $253 million after finding the pharmaceutical giant liable for gender discrimination in pay, promotions, and relating to pregnancy. The case benefited over 7,000 female pharmaceutical representatives.
Recognized as Law Firm of the Year

Civil Rights Firm of the Year
Employment Rights Firm of the Year
Human Rights Firm of the Year

Labor and Employment Firm of the Year

Employment Practice Group of the Year

Benefits Group of the Year