Understanding Class and Collective Actions
What Is a Class Action or Collective Action?
Class actions are a type of lawsuit in which one or several people sue on behalf of a group of people, usually referred to as “the class.” These lawsuits generally include an issue that is common to all members of the class, such as gender discrimination. When these claims involve federal wage-and-hour violations (for example, overtime), we refer to them as “collective actions,” which are similar in principle but follow a different procedural path.
More specifically, a class action allows one or more individuals (called “class representatives” or “named plaintiffs”) to file a lawsuit on behalf of a larger group of people at their work when the employer has harmed them all in a similar way. Instead of each person filing their own individual lawsuit, a class action consolidates these claims into a single, powerful case.
Class actions are particularly valuable in employment law when a company’s policy or practice affects many workers in similar ways—such as discriminatory hiring practices, unequal pay and promotion practices, and wage theft.
Why Bring a Class Action?
Class actions offer significant advantages for workers seeking justice:
- Strength in numbers. When multiple people come forward with similar claims, it demonstrates a pattern of conduct rather than an isolated incident. This makes your case more compelling and harder for defendants to dismiss.
- Shared resources. The legal costs and risks are distributed across the group rather than falling on one person. This makes it financially feasible to challenge large corporations with substantial legal resources.
- Greater accountability. Class actions can force companies to change harmful policies that affect many workers, not just resolve one person’s complaint. When employers face consequences for systemic misconduct, it creates lasting change.
- Efficiency and protection. Rather than dozens or hundreds of individual lawsuits, one case addresses everyone’s claims at once. There is safety and power in collective action, especially when challenging powerful employers.
Common Types of Employment Class Actions
Class actions often arise from company-wide policies or practices that affect groups of workers. Our firm handles cases involving:
Discrimination and Harassment
- Gender discrimination in pay, promotion, or hiring
- Race discrimination affecting advancement and compensation
- National origin or ethnicity discrimination in pay, promotions, and firings.
- Age discrimination in layoffs, hiring, or career opportunities
- Disability discrimination and failure to accommodate
- Pregnancy discrimination and inadequate leave policies
- LGBTQ+ discrimination in workplace treatment and benefits
Wage and Hour Violations
- Unpaid overtime and misclassification of employees
- Minimum wage violations
- Off-the-clock work requirements
- Meal and rest break violations
- Wage theft and improper deductions
Hiring, Pay, and Promotion Practices
- Discriminatory hiring practices, including use of AI or automated screening tools that have disparate impact
- Glass ceiling barriers preventing advancement
- Unequal pay for equal work
- Biased performance evaluation systems
Policy-Based Violations
- Return-to-office mandates without reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers, caregivers, or employees with disabilities
- Discriminatory leave policies
- Retaliation against workers who report problems or assert their rights
- Systemic harassment tolerated by management
Industry-Specific Patterns
- Women in male-dominated industries—such as technology, finance, engineering, and trucking—facing barriers to pay, promotion, and fair treatment
- Racial discrimination in specific sectors or companies
- Age-based layoffs or forced retirements
How to Know If You Have a Class Action Case
Your situation may be appropriate for a class action if:
- The situation involves many people. You know others at your company or former employees who faced similar treatment.
- There’s a common policy or practice. A company-wide policy, procedure, or pattern of behavior is harming people rather than one supervisor’s isolated actions.
- The employer is sizeable. Larger companies (typically those with substantial numbers of employees) are more likely to have systematic patterns affecting multiple workers.
- The harm is similar across the group. While individual damages may vary, the type of violation and how it occurred should be similar for class members.
- There are clear legal violations. The employer’s conduct violates employment laws, such as anti-discrimination statutes, wage and hour laws, or worker protection regulations.
Even if you’re not sure your situation fits these criteria, it’s worth reaching out. Our experienced employment attorneys can help you evaluate whether a class action is appropriate.
Client Testimonials
“They have given me some closure for the first time in over five years.”
– Former Client
“Forever indebted to them”
– Suzy Reingold
“This Firm has proven again and again it has the necessary talent, experience, intelligence, creativity, and resources to represent workers and whistleblowers successfully against even the country’s largest employers.”
– Lorene Schaefer, Esq., President of WinWinResolve.com and Former GC of GE Transportation
“Collectively the SHSM team represented the highest level of professionalism, integrity, and passionate care for justice that I have ever witnessed in my career.”
– David Chen, a Former Client
“Everyone I interacted with at Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight was not only accomplished and brilliant at what they do, but also good people with good values.”
– Former Client
“Each member of the Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight team shows ultimate professionalism, mastery of the law, unwavering dedication to the clients and passion for the cause. And most important to me, kindness and compassion.”
– Former Client Donna Kassman, Lead Plaintiff in KPMG Gender Discrimination Class Action
As an attorney on the defense side, I can say there is simply no one better than Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight. That view is shared by defense attorneys around the country. They outwork the other side, master the law and facts, and achieve great results.”
– Maria Hallas, Attorney and Journalist
“Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight have taken the pharmaceutical industry by storm. They are shattering the glass ceiling imposed on women by pharma’s old boys’ club.”
– Jacqueline Pena, Lead Plaintiff in The Class Action Wellens v. Daiichi
“I deeply appreciated not only [the Firm’s] astute legal counsel, but also the understanding and human touch they used at every turn. . . . As a lawyer myself, I felt privileged to have gotten the chance to work with them.”
– Female Law Partner
“I contacted SHSM because it has a stellar reputation as a champion for workplace gender equality. That reputation is well-deserved; SHSM is a deft negotiator, a voracious advocate, and – most importantly – knows how to get results.”
– Former Client and VP of a Major Technology Company
“The team at Sanford Heisler consists of great people who are not only very skillful in the legal domain, but are also wonderful human beings with the highest degree of empathy for their clients.”
– A Female Director in a Tech Company
“Thank you again to you all for representing me on this matter. You are all phenomenal. I am very grateful for your knowledge, professionalism and compassion.”
– Big Law Attorney
“The result was extraordinary.”
– Marc Thomas, Attorney and Former CEO of GE Aviation Materials
Recognized as Law Firm of the Year

Civil Rights Firm of the Year
Employment Rights Firm of the Year
Human Rights Firm of the Year

Labor and Employment Firm of the Year

Employment Practice Group of the Year

Benefits Group of the Year