Age Discrimination Attorneys
Our compassionate legal professionals understand that as workers get older, they often worry about age discrimination in the workplace. Although many people work for most of their life with the goal of one day retiring, economic conditions have forced more and more people to remain in the workforce into their 60s and 70s.
Unfortunately, senior employees sometimes face discrimination at work because their employers or coworkers believe their production and contributions to the company will decline since they are older than other people in the workplace. If you have experienced age discrimination at work and want to take legal action, then please get in touch with the premier attorneys at Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight so we can defend your best interests.
- Am I Protected From Age Discrimination?
- Examples of Age Discrimination
- Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
- Frequently Asked Questions
Am I Protected From Age Discrimination?
Under the Age Discrimination Employment Act (ADEA), employees over the age of 40 are protected from being discriminated against because of their age when it comes to any terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. This includes hiring, firing, promotion, job assignments, and training.
Common Examples Of Age Discrimination
Age discrimination can take many forms. Some forms of age discrimination are subtle while others are blatant.
Common examples of age discrimination include:
- Employers or coworkers stereotyping you because you are older than other employees. This can include failing to give you favorable assignments because they assume you are out of touch, unfamiliar with new technologies, or incapable of meeting the physical demands of the job.
- Poor performance reviews even though you have the same strong work habits as when you were younger.
- Younger employees are given preferential treatment, such as always getting the best assignments, promotions, or equipment, despite the experience and qualifications of senior employees.
- Harassment and other actions that are intended to make work-life more difficult and force you to quit.
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
We know that older employees facing discrimination because of their age struggle to find gainful employment and have to deal with questionable work conditions. That is why our age discrimination lawyers use cutting-edge resources and extensive legal knowledge to help clients secure substantial financial compensation and hold their employers accountable for their actions.
Age Discrimination FAQs
Are all employers covered by the ADEA?
Although the ADEA applies to employers with 20 or more employees, many states have enacted similar laws that cover employers with fewer employees.
What is the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act?
The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) clarifies prohibitions in ADEA and establishes specific requirements for waiving the right to bring action against the employer as part of the terms of a severance agreement. The OWBPA requires that waivers be “knowing and voluntary” to ensure that an employee has a legitimate opportunity to make an informed choice about the terms of the severance agreement.
What is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)?
Under the ADEA, employers can institute age limits if they claim that a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) applies to the position. The employer must prove that the age limit is reasonably necessary to the essence of the business.
Client Testimonials
“They have given me some closure for the first time in over five years.”
– Former Client
“Forever indebted to them”
– Suzy Reingold
“This Firm has proven again and again it has the necessary talent, experience, intelligence, creativity, and resources to represent workers and whistleblowers successfully against even the country’s largest employers.”
– Lorene Schaefer, Esq., President of WinWinResolve.com and Former GC of GE Transportation
“Collectively the SHSM team represented the highest level of professionalism, integrity, and passionate care for justice that I have ever witnessed in my career.”
– David Chen, a Former Client
“Everyone I interacted with at Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight was not only accomplished and brilliant at what they do, but also good people with good values.”
– Former Client
“Each member of the Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight team shows ultimate professionalism, mastery of the law, unwavering dedication to the clients and passion for the cause. And most important to me, kindness and compassion.”
– Former Client Donna Kassman, Lead Plaintiff in KPMG Gender Discrimination Class Action
As an attorney on the defense side, I can say there is simply no one better than Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight. That view is shared by defense attorneys around the country. They outwork the other side, master the law and facts, and achieve great results.”
– Maria Hallas, Attorney and Journalist
“Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight have taken the pharmaceutical industry by storm. They are shattering the glass ceiling imposed on women by pharma’s old boys’ club.”
– Jacqueline Pena, Lead Plaintiff in The Class Action Wellens v. Daiichi
“I deeply appreciated not only [the Firm’s] astute legal counsel, but also the understanding and human touch they used at every turn. . . . As a lawyer myself, I felt privileged to have gotten the chance to work with them.”
– Female Law Partner
“I contacted SHSM because it has a stellar reputation as a champion for workplace gender equality. That reputation is well-deserved; SHSM is a deft negotiator, a voracious advocate, and – most importantly – knows how to get results.”
– Former Client and VP of a Major Technology Company
“The team at Sanford Heisler consists of great people who are not only very skillful in the legal domain, but are also wonderful human beings with the highest degree of empathy for their clients.”
– A Female Director in a Tech Company
“Thank you again to you all for representing me on this matter. You are all phenomenal. I am very grateful for your knowledge, professionalism and compassion.”
– Big Law Attorney
“The result was extraordinary.”
– Marc Thomas, Attorney and Former CEO of GE Aviation Materials
$253 Million Settlement
Gender Discrimination Verdict Against Pharma Company
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight achieved the largest jury verdict in U.S. history in an employment discrimination case. A jury awarded $253 million after finding the pharmaceutical giant liable for gender discrimination in pay, promotions, and relating to pregnancy. The case benefited over 7,000 female pharmaceutical representatives.
Read More Working For Justice Blogs
- by Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP
- Age Discrimination
This blog was co-authored by Leigh Anne St. Charles and Jonathan Tepe. After nearly two years of highly contested litigation, the Eastern District of Tennessee United States District Court recently granted final approval of a class action settlement resolving Tennessee auto-workers’ age discrimination claims against Volkswagen. Plaintiffs, represented by attorneys in ’s Nashville and New York offices, brought this […]
- by Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP
- Age Discrimination
In cases against private employers under the Age Discrimination of Employment Act (ADEA), employees must establish traditionally “but for” causation. See Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., 557 U.S. 167 (2009). This basically means that the termination or other adverse action at issue would not have happened without the unlawful discriminatory motive. This standard is grounded in […]
- by Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP
- Age Discrimination
Several recent studies demonstrate that age discrimination is pervasive in American workplaces, which is causing extensive damage to the health and careers of older workers. According to a 2018 AARP survey, about three in five older workers have either seen or experienced age discrimination in the workplace, and more than nine in ten older workers […]
Recognized as Law Firm of the Year

Civil Rights Firm of the Year 2022
Employment Rights Firm of the Year 2021
Human Rights Firm of the Year 2021

Labor and Employment Firm of the Year
2021 and 2020

Employment Practice Group of the Year
2021, 2019, 2018 and 2016