Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight Logo
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight Logo
U

Categories

Sexual Violence & Victims’ Rights

The Speak Out Act: Another Step Forward in the Battle Against Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

On Thursday, September 29, the Speak Out Act passed in the Senate with bipartisan support. If it passes in the House and is signed into law by President Biden, it will be another important step toward holding perpetrators of workplace misconduct accountable. Following the passage of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Harassment Act of 2021 (the Ending Forced Arbitration Act) earlier this year, this development is a clear sign of progress toward eliminating the hurdles that survivors of workplace sexual assault and sexual harassment face when they try to seek redress for what they have endured. What is the Ending Forced Arbitration Act? The passage of the Ending Forced Arbitration Act last March was a landmark moment in the fight against sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace. The Ending Forced Arbitration Act makes forced arbitration clauses in employment contracts voidable insofar as they relate to sexual misconduct claims. Such clauses force employees to resolve their workplace disputes through arbitration rather than in court. The Act was not an all-in-one fix, though. First, the Act addressed only sexual assault and sexual harassment claims, leaving access to justice for other types of discrimination for another day. Second, […]

read more

California Passes the Nation’s First Stealthing Law

Stealthing is a concept that you likely know about, even if you are unfamiliar with the term. It refers to nonconsensual condom removal, a behavior that is alarmingly prevalent. Studies have revealed that 5% of men and nearly 19% of women knew that they experienced stealthing,[1] and nearly 10% of the young men openly admit to it.[2] Rates are likely even higher[3] for at least three reasons: (1) many victims never learn that their partners removed condoms; (2) a strong stigma against labeling the practice a form of sexual assault lingers[4]; and (3) there has been a dearth of empirical research on the issue.[5] Until recently, the law has struggled to appropriately target and address this sexual harm.[1] But that changed in California on October 7, 2021. Thanks to the advocacy of Assembly member Cristina Garcia, the state enacted the country’s first express prohibition on stealthing.[2] The bill expands the civil definition of “sexual battery” to the removal of a condom without verbal consent during sexual activity. Therefore, people who have experienced stealthing can now bring a lawsuit for monetary damages. The legislative development carries no criminal penalties, but many sexual assault advocates consider this preferable.[8] This is in part because of the criminal legal system’s structural failings, […]

read more

Legal Options for Victims of Crime

Victims of crime are often completely overwhelmed. Not only are they navigating the emotional and physical impact of the crime on their lives but they are also faced with uncertainty about their legal options. Victims of crime, including sexual assault survivors, regularly come to us soon after the crime happened. Often the first question they ask is: “Now what do I do?” Frequently, crime victims do not realize that there is an array of different legal avenues they can pursue in both the criminal and civil justice systems. First, any victim of a crime can report the crime to the police and initiate the criminal process. The police will investigate the allegations, generally collecting evidence and interviewing witnesses. If the police believe there is adequate corroboration of the allegations, they will present the case to the prosecutor. Depending on the nature of the crime, the case might be presented to either a local, state, or federal prosecutor. The prosecutor then makes the decision about whether to charge the perpetrator and proceed with the prosecution. In a criminal proceeding, it is the government – not the victim – who brings the case and ultimately makes the decisions about how the case […]

read more

Congress Must Open the Courthouse Doors to Uphold Military Members’ Civil Rights

Workers and students who experience civil rights violations have a plethora of legal tools at their disposal to seek accountability and relief—ranging from constitutional, to statutory, to tort claims. But the courthouse doors have long been closed to one group, whose exclusion from remedies by the government which they defend is particularly jarring: members of the military. Federal civil rights statutes often exclude uniformed members of the military. See, e.g., 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(4) (excepting from Title IX’s coverage an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for the military services of the United States, or the merchant marine”); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.103(d)(1) (noting that various civil rights statutes only apply to non-uniformed members of military departments); Jackson v. Modly, 949 F.3d 763, 772 (DC Cir. 2020) (“[E]very circuit court of appeals to address this issue since 1978 has held that uniformed members of the armed forces are not included within the protections of Title VII . . . .”). But Congress had already provided service members a legal remedy through tort law. The Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA), passed in the first half of the 20th Century, allowed military members to sue the United States for their injuries—except for […]

read more

Categories